Oh boo-hoo, Politico's lying out it's teeth again.

Politico's (D-DC) whole article is a giant piece of lying spin, but figured I'd link it all the same. Classic Leftist fabrication of "we're not biased because we're saying we're not biased". Kind of like saying you're not a thief when you're caught walking out of the house with an armful of stuff. In a fair world Harris and VanDehei would face tar, feathering, and being run out of town.

But to these half-wits having to cover for their corruption is an annoyance!

Before answering the question, indulge us in noting that the subject of ideological bias in the news media is a drag.

Imagine that, people like we commoners having the temerity to demand a free press are a drag on our masters. Silly me.

It's a sad world when we'd find fairer coverage of the news at Al Jazeera than in places like the Politico.

John and Jim, do us a favor and ditch the Kool-Aid.

Newspapers and endorsements.

Instapundit links an article showing which papers endorse whom this year and compares it to last cycle. It's a neat map and is of especial concern for the seventeen remaining newspaper readers in America.

Why discuss the charge when you can slander the messenger?

Another example of how the AP (D-NY) shills for an unprepared Obama can be found here. The headline of:

Analysis: Palin's words carry racial tinge

is meant for an internet reader to associate Palin and racial, not to add any real discussion to Palin's factually valid comments. And this is part of how the Media serves their masters so well - replying with ad hominem slander.

Make no mistake that this is a vitally important election. And that the novice Obama is going into this with a media that refuses to investigate or 'vet' him. Yes, that's insane. And what's even more insane is the number of people who will still vote for a ruthless Obama because of this deceit by the media.

ADDENDUM:

Looks like Instapundit is all over this already. If you think Bush was bad, the race-baiting Obama will be miles worse.